Yields are near 0%. Why should I own bonds?

By Erich M. Hickey, CFA® , Terrance Rebello, CFA® and CIPM™

Since 1981, when the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield peaked at over 15%, investors have enjoyed the benefit of holding Treasury bonds in their portfolios. Longer-maturity Treasuries have been the perfect complement to equities. Over a full market cycle, Treasuries and equities have been positively correlated, with each producing attractive positive long-term returns. Also, in almost every period in which equities have declined since 1982, U.S. Treasuries have been negatively correlated in the short term and provided an offset to temporary equity losses. Portfolios with 60% to 70% in global equities and 30% to 40% in investment-grade bonds have produced attractive risk-adjusted returns for close to 40 years. History, however, is unlikely to repeat itself in the coming decade. The 10-year Treasury now yields under 0.75%, so future price appreciation will be limited unless yields move sharply negative. Also, investors will receive virtually no income to offset price declines if yields move higher. With the risks seemingly skewed to the downside, should we abandon bonds in our portfolios?

The short answer is no. Bonds still diversify equity risk, provide liquidity and generate income. Return expectations must be adjusted, but fixed income will continue to play an important role in portfolios. Also, bonds can serve as an emotional hedge for investors. By controlling portfolio losses in adverse equity markets and ensuring liquidity is available for cash needs, an allocation to bonds can create peace of mind and avoid irrational, emotional decision making in times of crisis.

Long-dated Treasuries are an attractive “hedge” to an equity portfolio. For example, the 30-year Treasury bond appreciated over 20% in the first quarter of 2020, while the S&P 500 declined 19.6%. While Treasuries are not a perfect hedge, during most sharp equity corrections in the last 20 years, U.S. Treasuries have rarely declined and have often appreciated materially. Treasury yields rarely increase sharply, which lowers the cost to investors for owning these assets in their portfolios. We also believe that Treasury yields are unlikely to increase materially during an equity sell-off, which means government bonds should continue to act as a hedge during market turmoil. 

Second, Treasury bonds can be converted to cash to meet liquidity needs. As we experienced in March, sometimes pricing may be adversely affected in a crisis, but the impact of these price concessions was considerably lower than the impact of selling other risky assets.

Third, there are many other types of bonds that have higher yields than Treasuries and can be used to generate income in a low-rate environment. In order to earn a higher yield, investors will take on different risks, including liquidity risk or credit risk. We recommend discussing the potential downside of these bonds with a financial professional before considering these securities in a portfolio.

How much should I allocate to fixed income? 

The size of your total fixed-income allocation will vary depending on your individual risk tolerance, liquidity needs, income needs, liabilities, objectives and assets that you hold outside of your liquid investments. Most of these items should be included in your investment policy statement and reviewed at least annually. For business owners, we account for their businesses in their overall asset allocation. This exercise includes assessing profitability, reviewing the capitalization of the business and reviewing current credit agreements. More importantly, if the operating business is cyclical, leveraged or growing rapidly, we encourage owners to consider potential liquidity needs under more draconian assumptions and recommend a larger allocation to fixed income. Earlier this year, we learned how difficult it may be to access cash, so planning ahead can prevent the need to sell depreciated assets for liquidity.

For foundations committed to maintaining their spending policy, liquidity is also paramount. We recommend having two years of operating and funding requirements available in conservative fixed-income strategies. This will ensure your foundation can meet its commitments to its grantees and continue operations without disruption. It also creates peace of mind.

What should my fixed income allocation look like?

With yields close to 0%, we separate our fixed income allocation into three parts: liquidity assets, risk off hedges and total return assets.

Liquidity assets: In general, we recommend keeping at least one or two years of cash needs in shorter-dated bonds, including Treasuries and other investment grade bonds. The prices of these securities will have a negligible sensitivity to interest rates and price movement should be modest. One drawback is that current yields are near 0%. In our opinion, having some allocation to cash-like securities without the risk of loss overshadows the opportunity cost of losing potential return by taking on more interest rate or credit risk.

Risk-off hedges: As we highlighted, longer dated Treasuries represent an attractive “risk-off” hedge at the lowest price. Include longer maturity bonds in allocations as an “anchor to windward.” This part of the portfolio is designed to preserve capital when other assets decline in value. Appreciated hedges can be sold to rebalance into equities or for liquidity needs.
Total return assets: We allocate a portion of our fixed-income portfolios to strategies that offer higher yield or total return potential. These strategies generally have less liquidity and more credit risk but tend to be less correlated to equity markets and interest rates. In the current market, certain securities that were excluded from the Federal Reserve Quantitative Easing Programs have been orphaned by investors and offer high yields and attractive total return potential.

The most significant determinant of future returns for fixed-income assets is the starting yield. Less risky bonds are currently at or near all-time lows in yield, so future returns will be likely be meager. Given the low expected returns, we do not advocate abandoning your allocation to fixed income in your liquid portfolios. Bonds serve numerous purposes in a diversified portfolio, and while the tailwind from a near 40-year secular decline in interest rates is gone, bonds should still perform well during future equity market crises. We recommend reviewing your portfolio to ensure you understand what you own and why it is a part of your fixed-income allocation.

Erich M. Hickey, CFA® is Chief Operating Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Drexel Morgan Capital Advisers. He is responsible for macroeconomic research, financial market analysis, investment strategy and research, manager selection, asset allocation and portfolio management.  He also manages client portfolios and relationships. He is a member of the firm’s Investment and Management Committees. Terrance Rebello, CFA® and CIPM™. is a Portfolio Manager at Drexel Morgan Capital Advisers. He is responsible for managing and monitoring client portfolios, including delivering investment results to clients, asset allocation, and trading. He performs investment research, including manager due diligence and periodic reviews. He also contributes to market and macroeconomic research.  He is a member of the firm’s Investment Committee. 


Disclosure:
IMPORTANT INFORMATION All information contained herein is based on past performance and is not intended to be indicative of future results. The indices used are unmanaged and return figures reflect the reinvestment of dividends and earnings. There is no guarantee that historical risk and rate of return will persist in the future. Any third-party information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable; however, no assurance can be given that all external information is correct. All market prices, data and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy, may not be audited information and are subject to change without notice. Statements in this commentary that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements based on the investment team’s current expectations and assumptions of economic and other future conditions and forecasts of future events, circumstances and results. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. The forecasts and opinions in this piece are provided for informational purposes only and may not actually come to pass. The views and opinions expressed above are those of the portfolio management team at the time of writing and are subject to market, economic and other conditions that may change at any time, and, therefore, actual results may differ materially from those expected. They should not be construed as recommendations to buy or sell securities in the asset classes or countries discussed. The analysis provided should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment decision, but as illustrations of broader economic themes. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statement made by us or on our behalf as a result of new information, future events or other factors. This material does not constitute a recommendation to the suitability of any product or security and does not constitute an offer to buy or sell any financial instrument or to participate in any trading strategy. This material may not be reproduced, shown or quoted to members of the general public or used in written form as sales literature. Investing in securities involves risk of loss that clients should be prepared to bear and there is no guarantee that any investment strategy will meet its objective.

PROFESSIONAL DESIGNATIONS The descriptions of Professional Designations are available on the CFA Institute’s website in order to assist you in evaluating the professional designations and minimum requirements of our investment professionals to hold these designations. To learn more about the CFA® and CIPM ™ charter, visit www.cfainstitute.org.

 

Other Related Articles

  • Family giving during COVID-19

    Over the past several months, we have heard time and again: We are all in this together. Truly, not a single person in our country has been unaffected by COVID-19. Whether you or someone you know is a...

  • Laird & Co. toasts the 10th generation

    When you’re the ninth generation leading a family business that served George Washington, you don’t want to be the one who screws it up, says Lisa Laird Dunn, executive vice president and global a...

  • Redefining ownership as shareholder stewardship

    Thirty years ago, I was faced with a typical family business crisis. My father, the founder of our family-owned industrial fabrics company, Seaman Corporation, had passed away prematurely at the age o...

  • Family office decision factors

    Advisers offer these suggestions for families considering a single-family office (SFO):• Solicit feedback from the family about potential benefits. Is the primary purpose to bring the family assets ...