Username  Password   Forget your password? | Contact Us
Current Cover

Greenpeace report: Koch Industries funds climate denial

A report published on the website of environmental activist group Greenpeace USA alleges that Koch Industries, brothers Charles G. Koch and David H. Koch, and foundations controlled by the company and the Koch family have "quietly funneled" $50 million to "climate-denial front groups that are working to delay policies and regulations aimed at stopping global warming."

Greenpeace wrote on its website:

Charles G. Koch and David H. Koch have a vested interest in delaying climate action: they've made billions from their ownership and control of Koch Industries, an oil corporation that is the second largest privately held company in America (which also happens to have an especially poor environmental record).... The Koch brothers, their family members, and their employees direct a web of financing that supports conservative special interest groups and think-tanks, with a strong focus on fighting environmental regulation, opposing clean energy legislation, and easing limits on industrial pollution.

 

Koch Industries' official response to the Greenpeace report, cited on the New York Times' "Green Inc." blog, said:

In a consistent, principled effort for more than 50 years -- long before climate change was a key policy issue -- Koch companies and Koch foundations have worked to advance economic freedom and market-based policy solutions to challenges faced by society..... The Greenpeace report mischaracterizes these efforts and distorts the environmental record of our companies. Koch companies have long supported science-based inquiry and dialogue about climate change and proposed responses to it. Koch companies have put tremendous energy into achieving sound environmental stewardship and consistently implemented innovative and cost-effective ways to reduce waste and emissions, including greenhouse gases, associated with our manufacturing and processes.... Both a free society and the scientific method require an open and honest airing of all sides, not demonizing and silencing those with whom you disagree. We've strived to encourage an intellectually honest debate on the scientific basis for claims of harm from greenhouse gases....

 

(Sources: Greenpeace.org; "Green Inc.," nytimes.com, March 30, 2010.)



Get the RSS Feed

Recent Posts

Fiat Industrial switching tax residency

Rodale launches e-commerce site

Krupp family foundation seen as blocking company’s recovery

Report: Pritzker’s family trust fee is high

H&M CEO sticks with long-term view

Leaked report says LVMH plotted to build stake in Hermès

Washington Post Co. folds two Maryland papers

Penny Pritzker says she plans to resign from Hyatt board

NBA owners vote against Maloof team relocation

Swatch names co-founder’s daughter as Winston CEO

Monthly Archives

May 2013

April 2013

March 2013

February 2013

January 2013

December 2012

November 2012

October 2012

September 2012

August 2012

July 2012

June 2012

May 2012

April 2012

March 2012

February 2012

January 2012

December 2011

November 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

March 2011

February 2011

January 2011

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

May 2010

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010

January 2010

December 2009

November 2009

October 2009

September 2009

August 2009

July 2009

May 2009

Complete Archives

Family Business Publishing Company • 1845 Walnut Street • Suite 900 • Philadelphia, PA 19103 • (800) 637-4464