Family Business Magazine E-Newsletter
November 4, 2008



Contents
1.  Sumner Redstone sells $233 million in Viacom, CBS shares.
2.  Concerns about Ford family involvement prompted Kerkorian to cut his stake.
3.  Modelo seeks to buy back Anheuser-Busch's stake.
4.  Kaplan generates half of Washington Post Co.'s profits.
5.  New York Times Co. to consider cutting dividend.
6.  Chris Galvin rues 'being excommunicated' from Motorola.
7.  Ensuring sound governance by family company boards.
8.  Creating a family charter.



1.  Sumner Redstone sells $233 million in Viacom, CBS shares.  Sumner Redstone has sold $233 million of his holdings in Viacom Inc. and CBS Corp. to meet loan terms, the Wall Street Journal reported. He had used his stakes in the two media companies "to help back a $1.6 billion loan to expand his family's movie theater chain," the article said. "According to people familiar with the situation, he was caught off guard by the turn of events," the Journal reported. The loan reportedly "was linked to the operating performance of National Amusements as well as Viacom and CBS stock," the Journal explained. So far, Redstone has sold only non-voting stock, thus remaining in control of the companies, "but he could be forced to sell more stock if the companies' share values fall," the article said. An analyst told the Journal, "If National Amusements is subsequently forced to sell voting shares, this could put CBS and Viacom in play." But Redstone asserted that he will not sell Viacom or CBS, the Journal reported in a later article. "Mr. Redstone's comments suggest he would turn to other assets if National Amusements found itself in the situation of having to repay a big chunk of its debt," the Journal noted. The $1.6 billion loan "has raised questions among investors as to why National Amusements needed so much money," the earlier article said. The loan was used primarily to expand National Amusements' privately held movie theater chain, run by Redstone's daughter Shari, who has been "building the business aggressively," the Journal reported. "Mr. Redstone and his daughter have been at odds over the future of the theater business." Analyst Rich Greenfield of Pali Research told Portfolio.com that another factor behind National Amusements' debt is Sumner Redstone's 2002 divorce settlement. The terms were never made public, but Greenfield speculated that Redstone's ex-wife, Phyllis, may have received between $1.5 billion and $2.5 billion. And another divorce is in the works. Redstone and his second wife, Paula Fortunato, have announced that they are ending their marriage, Portfolio.com reported. According to the Los Angeles Times, the terms of their prenuptial agreement stipulate that Fortunato will receive at least $5 million, or $1 million for each year of marriage.  (Sources: Wall Street Journal, Oct. 14, 2008, Oct. 23, 2008; Portfolio.com, Oct. 17, 2008, Oct. 22, 2008.)

Return to the top.





2.  Concerns about Ford family involvement prompted Kerkorian to cut his stake.  Billionaire investor Kirk Kerkorian, who cut his stake in Ford Motor Co. from 6.43% to 6.09% and may sell all of his remaining shares, was "disturbed by the abrupt departure of Ford Chief Financial Officer Don Leclair and the immediate resignation of two board members" in October, the Wall Street Journal reported. Kerkorian and his financial adviser "worried the departures signaled the Ford family was tightening its control of the company and could impede its turnaround," the article said. "When he first began buying Ford shares April 2, Mr. Kerkorian thought the company was headed for a rebound that could double or triple his money," the Journal report noted. "Instead, high gas prices, the sluggish economy and the credit crisis pushed the car industry into a deeper downturn." The Journal's "Deal Journal" column noted that Kerkorian's decision to reduce his stake in the company "is a big no-confidence signal at a time when the stock is near historic lows."  (Source: Wall Street Journal, Oct. 22, 2008.)

Return to the top.





3.  Modelo seeks to buy back Anheuser-Busch's stake.  Mexican brewer Grupo Modelo SA is seeking to buy back all or part of Anheuser-Busch's 50% stake in the company, the Wall Street Journal reported. "If struck, the deal would substantially alter InBev NV's pending $52 billion purchase of Anheuser-Busch," the article said. The report noted that Modelo "has been approached by a number of parties including SABMiller PLC about jointly acquiring the Anheuser stake" but that "Modelo has yet to decide whether to pursue a partnership." The Journal article said that Anheuser's interest in Modelo "was part of Anheuser's allure for InBev." Modelo has filed notice to begin arbitration on the matter but is also conducting settlement talks with InBev, according to the report.  (Source: Wall Street Journal, Oct. 17, 2008.)

Return to the top.





4.  Kaplan generates half of Washington Post Co.'s profits.  The growth of the Washington Post Co.'s Kaplan education division "has had a profound impact on its parent," according to a profile in Fortune. "Behind the scenes and with little fanfare, [Jonathan Grayer, who runs the division] has quietly transformed Kaplan from a stodgy test-preparation provider into one of the country's largest education companies, with one million students, 70 companies, and an online law school," the article said. "Sales in 2007 totaled $2 billion, compared with $80 million in 1994, the year Grayer was named CEO." The report noted that Kaplan now accounts for half of the Post Co.'s $4 billion in annual sales. "Partially as a result, the Post's stock ... has fallen less than the shares of other newspaper companies," Fortune reported. But Kaplan faces tough challenges ahead, "including a slowdown in the U.S., where -- because of the credit crunch -- student loans have become harder to obtain," the report noted. "To make up for that, Kaplan is undertaking a risky expansion overseas. The company is also facing its share of legal tussles, part of a broader web of student-loan scandals." Meanwhile, the Post Co. has acquired Foreign Policy Magazine, according to Folio, a trade magazine for the publishing industry.  (Sources: Fortune, Sept. 15, 2008; Folio, Sept. 29, 2008.)

Return to the top.





5.  New York Times Co. to consider cutting dividend.  The New York Times Co. will consider cutting its dividend, Bloomberg.com reported. The company posted a third-quarter loss from continuing operations of $2.08 million, or 1 cent per share, according to the report. The controlling Ochs-Sulzberger family receives $25.1 million a year, the report noted. According to Bloomberg, Times Co. CFO James Follo said in a conference call, "On the dividend front, it's a fairly dynamic discussion." The report added, "Last year, New York Times raised its quarterly dividend by 31 percent to 23 cents a share, the biggest increase in a decade." An analyst told Bloomberg that "A significant cut to the payout may fracture family unity and lead to the sale of the company to outsiders or a private-equity group that includes some family members." A lengthy profile in New York magazine noted that "Today there is greater possibility for division in the Sulzberger family than there was a decade ago." The report said that in the past ten years, "at least seventeen new family members have turned 25, the age at which they are allowed to join the trust's board or vote for trustees.... In 2001, the family trust was quietly amended, expanding the number of family trustees and allowing a less than unanimous vote on 'extraordinary corporate transactions' -- leaving the door open for a faction of family members to push for a sale." Citing unnamed sources, the article said the family's trust is "surprisingly undiversified, with a high proportion in Times stock." The New York report noted that there is no obvious next-generation family successor. "One thing that would cause the fifth generation to take a sudden interest in the family business is a decrease in trust income" because most of the heirs depend on it for living expenses, the article said.  (Source: Bloomberg.com, Oct. 23, 2008; New York, Oct. 5, 2008.)

Return to the top.





6.  Chris Galvin rues 'being excommunicated' from Motorola.  In a recent interview in Portfolio, Chris Galvin -- the former CEO of Motorola and grandson of founder Paul Galvin -- discussed the pain he felt on being ousted by the board in 2003 after dramatic losses in 2001 and 2002. "My father's and my primary passion in life was Motorola," Galvin told Portfolio. "Being excommunicated from Motorola was so painful, it is beyond words." Galvin's successor, Ed Zander, got credit for the success of the Razr cell phone and a rise in the company stock price. In 2007 net income fell, activist investor Carl Icahn bought a stake in the company and the board fired Zander. Evidence shows that the Motorola's successes in 2003 and 2004 can be attributed to the efforts of Galvin rather than Zander, Portfolio reported, yet Zander insisted on radical changes. "One of the things I underestimated," Zander told Portfolio, "is that this is a company that has 70, 80 years of culture." Galvin, who after his ouster from Motorola founded private equity firm Chicago Harrison Street Capital with his father and brother, "may have botched his early years at [Motorola], but he pulled things together and started a turnaround," the article said. "[M]aybe he didn't have a chance; he may have started too young. Just as he figured out how to do his job, the board ran out of patience." The report added that "much of the blame falls on the company's board of 2003. While believing it was doing its fiduciary duty, it caved to pressure from Wall Street and the media to try to produce positive and predictable quarterly numbers. It fired the wrong man at the wrong time and hired the wrong man at the wrong time."  (Source: Portfolio, October 2008.)

Return to the top.





7.  Ensuring sound governance by family company boards.  "Like their counterparts in publicly traded companies, family company boards must adhere to fundamental governance principles," notes Robert H. Rock -- president of Family Business Publishing Company and MLR Holdings and chairman of the editorial advisory board of Directors & Boards -- in an article in The Family Business Shareholder's Handbook. He offers the following advice:
  1. A board should not attempt to manage a business. Independent directors must be careful not to usurp management's responsibility to manage the company, and CEOs must recognize the board's authority to oversee management.
  2. Boards must recruit directors who combine intelligence and experience with character and judgment. Strong, independent directors ask tough questions that challenge managers and hold them accountable for results. In effective family business boards, open dialogue and vigorous debate are encouraged, enabling directors to freely express their views, whether or not the family agrees with everything they say.
  3. The foremost accountability of a board is to represent the interests of stockholders by ensuring there is a top management team willing and able to pursue those interests. The board must ensure that top management candidates from both within and outside the family are being identified and developed.


For more advice on effective governance of your family company, see The Family Business Shareholder's Handbook. Learn more about the book and see the table of contents here.

Return to the top.



8.  Creating a family charter.  "A family charter or constitution provides direction for your family, especially when you move beyond a unilateral decision-maker," writes family business adviser Ellen Frankenberg in the current issue of Family Business Magazine. "Once owners multiply into the second and third generations, it becomes critical to have clear, written statements about the family's core values, goals, ethical principles, criteria for leadership and structures for governance." To get started on creating a charter, Frankenberg recommends that families ask each adult member to answer questions like the following. "After you've shared your ideas within the family circle," Frankenberg advises, "designate one or two members to pull together the key concepts and distill them into a one-page document."
  1. How do you feel about your family business?
  2. How important is it to you that this business remain in the family?
  3. What have been the ingredients for success in our company, especially compared to its competitors?
  4. What are the requirements for hiring other family members, especially in the successor generation?
  5. What ethical principles or guidelines will you propose for family members who work at the company?
  6. What criteria will future leaders/managers be required to meet?
  7. How will ownership be transmitted?
  8. How will the company be governed in the future?
  9. Which aspects of your family heritage do you wish to perpetuate?
  10. Does the family share a vision for the future?


For advice on the next steps, plus more family business tips and strategies, see the Autumn 2008 issue of Family Business Magazine. To learn how to subscribe to our award-winning print edition, see here.

Return to the top.

Is your e-mail address changing?  Unsubscribe your old address and subscribe your new one here.

Get an early start on your holiday shopping with a gift subscription to Family Business Magazine. See here for gift subscription information.

Quick Links:
The Family Business Shareholder's Handbook
The Family Business Mentoring Handbook
Family Business Magazine

No longer want to receive this e-newsletter?  Unsubscribe here.